Samuel Magill; Have I found his birth and parents?????
After over thirty years researching family history, I think
that I have finally cracked how we have Hunter in the Magill names.
Family lore had two different stories as to why our surname
is Magill;
The first one is that Samuel (Hunter), murdered a man called
Magill and took the Magill name and high-tailed it out of Ireland.
The second one is that he took his mother’s maiden name of
Magill and left Ireland because of reasons unknown.
While both of these
were interesting, I took them with a grain of salt. Samuel wasn’t above telling
‘stories.’
In February I was in Salt Lake City, home to the BIGGEST
FAMILY HISTORY LIBRARY in the world and have looked into Samuel’s birth. We
know that he was born in County Antrim between 1844-1849. This has been gleaned
from family lore and his death certificate.
Well before I arrived in Salt Lake City, I found a birth of
one Samuel Magill, son of a James Magill and Mary.
I then looked for
their marriage and found this.
James Magill m Mary Ann Hunter, 1850. This sent tingles down my spine. Could this
really be the answer?
Well…
I headed to B2 and the Irish records. Microfilm number 101313 holds the key.
The record had some words I couldn’t decipher but the
important bits were there.
Name Age Condition Occupation Abode Father
James Magill Full Bachelor Mechanic
Ballymoney James Magill
Mary Ann Hunter
Full
Spinster --------- Ballymoney William Hunter
Parish of Belfast, County of Antrim.
Presbyterian by Licence.
Both signed.
Date 29 March 1850.
Okay, this give us the names, James, William, Mary Ann and
Hunter. So are they THE ONES?
It took some searching for Samuel’s birth but this is what I
found.
Samuel Magill born 27 May 1849, Ballymoney Parish, Antrim,
Ireland to James Magill and Mary.
I know what you are thinking they married 1850 and he was
born 1849, really?
Well…
A note at the front of the Baptism Book reads;
Parish Church of
Ballymoney.
Baptisms and Births
1807 -1898.
Note.
The spelling of a Name
or Parish may vary quite markedly in different records. The name was often
spelt as it sounded to the writer; therefore it is advisable to note carefully
variations of spelling.
Some entries do not
appear to be recorded in their correct order – many entries (single &
multiple) appear in the register at much later dates.
I spoke to several
other credited genealogists. All agree that with the information I have and
what I have found, I can make the creditable assumption that Samuel Magill born
1849 is the son of James and Mary Magill and probably OUR Samuel.
It is also noted that in the baptism register that there is
only one surname give, meaning he was legitimate. I did see births where both
parent’s names were listed and the word illegitimate was used.
Bye for now,
Lilian.
Wonderful detective work Lilian, how great to have a photo of him too.
ReplyDeleteIt certainly pays to keep searching doesn't it?! Really interesting research.
ReplyDeleteCertainly sounds like you did! Congratulations!
ReplyDelete